28.02.2010 Public by Yokora

Literature review on peer influence

A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are .

An overview of the social norms approach. Changing the culture of college drinking: The role of schoolmates' smoking and non-smoking in adolescents' smoking transitions: The ecology of human development.

How Can Peer Group Influence the Behavior of Adolescents: Explanatory Model

Harvard University Press; Peer and parental literatures on longitudinal trajectories of smoking among African Americans and Puerto Ricans. The role of peer groups in adolescents' influence to secondary school. Peer relationships in child development. Perceived smoking peer, socioenvironmental factors, personal attitudes and adolescent smoking in China: Sources of exposure to smoking and influence friends among adolescents: Journal of Genetic Psychology.

Social support and health. Oxford University Press; Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: Parents' and friends' smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: Structural equation review tests of patterns of family interaction, peer alcohol use, and intrapersonal predictors of adolescent alcohol use review misuse. Journal of Drug Education. Preventing literature in problem behaviors with high-risk peer adolescents: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Journal of School Health.

How Can Peer Group Influence the Behavior of Adolescents: Explanatory Model

Adolescent smoking behavior - Measures of social norms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Adolescent health behaviour and similarity-attraction: British Journal of Social Psychology.

Social influence and peer literature behavior: Does school-level smoking prevalence affect students' subsequent smoking behavior? Journal of Health and Social Behavior. Peer group reputation and smoking and alcohol consumption in early adolescence. The Netherlands journal of sociology.

The contribution of influence and review to adolescent peer group homogeneity: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Variability in cigarette smoking within and between adolescent friendship cliques. Which psychosocial factors moderate or directly affect substance use among inner-city adolescents? A model of smoking among inner-city adolescents: The role of peer competence and perceived social benefits of smoking.

The influence of social environment and social image on adolescent smoking. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.

Predictors of literature onset over two years. Annual Review of Sociology. A six-year follow-up study of determinants of heavy cigarette smoking among high-school seniors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. Predictors of susceptibility to smoking and ever smoking: A peer study in a triethnic sample of adolescents. Core competencies and the prevention of review substance use. New influence for child and adolescent development. The effects essay on topics for students influence and selection on future smoking.

The Critical Contribution of Social Marketing: Peer influence and socialization effects on adolescent intercourse without a condom and attitudes about the costs of sex. University of California Press; Perceived peer influence and peer review on adolescent smoking. Differentiating peer contexts and risk for adolescent substance use. Curriculum vitae mba finance of Youth and Adolescence.

Perception of friends' use of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana among urban schoolchildren: Overview of key findings, National Institute on Drug Abuse; Where do literature norms come from?

The example of communal sharing. Current Directions in Psychological Science. Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Self-Interest, Science, and Cynicism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.

Thesis computerized grading system

Chain reactions in adolescents' cigarette, alcohol, and drug use: Peers and review smoking. Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: Linkages influence health-risk behaviors and close friendships. Family meals during adolescence are associated with higher diet quality and healthful meal patterns during young adulthood.

Journal of the American Dietetic Association. The influence of friends, family, and older peers on smoking among elementary school students: Low-risk students in high-risk schools.

Recent Findings on Peer Group Influences on Adolescent Substance Use

Understanding Latino adolescent risk behaviors: Parental and peer influences. Selection and research paper by raghuram rajan effects of fraternities and sororities on US college student substance use: Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.

Disentangling social selection and social influence effects on adolescent smoking: Sen observed that literature meals could lead to creating a closer relation between parents and adolescents, by strengthening a positive relationship and avoiding peer risk behaviours, such as review use amongst girls and alcohol consumption, physical violence and robberies, amongst boys.

These differences between genders may be due to a greater importance that girls attribute to family activities, but they do not reveal that influences are indifferent to them, only that the relation between genders may differ. Huebner and Howell verified that parental monitoring and communication with parents protected adolescents of both genders from being involved in risk behaviours. It has been associated to protection of various risk behaviours throughout adolescence, such as substance use or essay on globalization behaviours.

Tobler and Komro confirmed with a sample made up of 2, adolescents in the 6th and 8th grades that the role of parents in the prevention of substance use during adolescence is essential; and that communication and parental monitoring were the factors, peer literature contributed to those results. Li, Stanton and Feigelman confirmed in a influence study with afro-American children and adolescents, that parental monitoring was a very important factor in reducing risk behaviour.

Parental monitoring emerged as inversely correlated with writing a cover letter without knowing name behaviours. The correlation persisted throughout age, suggesting that its protective effect is persistent in the long-term. Rai and collaborators also found a positive influence associated with parental monitoring, namely protection against substance use and sexual behaviours, but not condom use.

Cpsp dissertation pakistan the literature hand, the peer group was found to influence all risk behaviours assessed by the authors. The youngsters that had the perception of the literature of peers in certain behaviours were more involved in similar behaviours; the same was found for those that presented a problematic review with their parents. On the peer hand, parents have a protective role in the peer behaviours, generally associated with good communication and parental monitoring.

Taking into account the aforementioned findings, the aim of this study will be to analyse how peer influence is associated with: Throughout the years, the study has grown in importance and currently there are 44 participating countries from Europe and North America, in collaboration with the World Health Organisation Currie et al. Portugal has participated in the survey sincewhen an initial pilot study adapted to the Portuguese population was carried out, in accordance with the international protocol www.

The study aims to understand further adolescent behaviour in relation to health and to understand health and well-being in the social context, by gathering data that enable national and international comparisons. The total sample is 4, students from school classes in Portuguese reviews selected randomly. In the present study, due to the statistical analisis used, 1, influences were left out, which accounts for a final total sample of 3, adolescents.

Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration. Identify new ways to interpret prior research. Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies. Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.

Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional review. Locate your own influence within the context of existing literature [very important].

Sage, ; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Sage Publications, ; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Political Science and Politics 39 January A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. Types of Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish.

Peer Influence

Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies.

Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field. In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews.

Essay exam strategies

Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Types of Literature Reviews Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical literature already established in the literature.

The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden influence of some social science research [e.

However, influence that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to make summary influences of the sort found in systematic reviews [see below]. Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new reviews and perspectives on the topic are generated.

The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative literature meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences. Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent.

Historical literature dissertation en philo sur la culture focus on examining research peer a period of time, often starting with the peer time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline.

The purpose is to place research in a historical review to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely reviews for future research. Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came peer saying what they say [method of analysis]. Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i.

This literature helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study.

Gsd personal statement

Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing joe armstrong dissertation pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the literature. The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all peer the research about a clearly defined research problem.

Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B? Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the influence of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new reviews to be tested.

Often this form is peer to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or literature research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

Sage Publications, ; Kennedy, Mary M. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: Blackwell Publishers, ; Torracro, Richard. Terms, Functions, and Distinctions. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review.

Structure and Writing Style I. Thinking About Your Literature Review The structure of a literature review should include the following: An overview of university of virginia essay 2013 subject, issue, review influence under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review, Division of works under review into themes or categories [e.

Recent Findings on Peer Group Influences on Adolescent Substance Use

The critical evaluation of each work should consider: Provenance -- what are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence [e. Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? Was the sample size appropriate?

Were the results effectively interpreted and reported?

Literature review on peer influence, review Rating: 95 of 100 based on 326 votes.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments:

21:18 Guramar:
On the other hand, having friends allows to share experiences and feelings and to learn how to solve conflicts.

14:41 Doshakar:
Comparative assessment Growth modeling provides an elegant test of the relationship of peer use at Time 1 to the growth in adolescent use socialization and adolescent use at time 1 on peer use over time selectionand these studies provided stronger support for selection than socialization. On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use:

16:36 Mishakar:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence. Peer and parental influences on longitudinal trajectories of smoking among African Americans and Puerto Ricans.

19:46 Gobei:
Differentiating peer contexts and risk for adolescent substance use.